Early american travel narratives and environmental history

I am slow, but I get there eventually. After leaving my first career, I started my PhD work in 1997, which is the same year Jose Antonio Brandao published his book, “Your fyre shall burn no more” Iroquois Policy Toward New France and its Native Allies to 1701. Brandao challenged the interpretation of the Beaver Wars, where Haudenosaunee supposedly engaged in warfare with other nations to dominate the beaver fur trade with New France. In doing so, he utilized the Jesuit Relations by counting the numbers of pelts recorded as captured in Haudenosaunee raids on other nations. Most of the book was made up of appendices showing his evidence. “No!” I exclaimed! “How can one overturn major historical interpretation by using sources in such a way?” I’m slow, but I get there. Yes, you can use sources in wild and crazy ways.

I have recently moved into the world of environmental history, with a particular interest in upstate NY, where I am located, and the Great Lakes. This project is the very slow start of thinking of how to use travel narratives to map environmental change over time.

I looked at four sources in particular, but really succeeded in mapping just one so far. These sources were found in the Early Encounters in North America database, published by Alexander Street. The idea was to first look at the word cloud produced by Voyant to get an understanding of what the author’s were focusing on. Then using Kepler I would chart the location of non-human animals, plants, and soil conditions as observed in the narratives. I am going slow, but I am getting there.

Journals of the Reverend Peter Jacobs 1852

As you can see from the above Voyant word cloud, Jacobs’s focus was not on the natural word so much as the spiritual. He’s there to convert Indians, but the fact that he is also travelling to Hudson Bay Co forts, economics is on his mind. His view of the natural world, like most Europeans had to do with how the natural world could be converted to commodities, which does go hand in hand with converting Indians to Christianity. He’s looking for God and gold, but we can also map out the presence of fish, plants, trees, copper, etc from his work. See below for that.

Flint’s letters from America 1818

Flint was less concerned about souls, and most of his observations were more about the cities he encountered than the natural world. This was more of an experience of spending much time reading with less to show in the end.

Observations on the inhabitants, climate, soil, rivers, productions, animals, and other matters worthy of notice, made by Mr. John Bartram, in his travels from Pensilvania to Onondago, Oswego, and the lake Ontario, in Canada, to which is annex’d, a curious account of the cataracts at Niagara, by Mr. Peter Kalm, a Swedish gentleman who travelled there. 1751

John Bartram was a naturalist who travelled extensively through the American colonies. As you can see from the word cloud, while he makes observation on many aspects of the region of what are now PA and NY, it’s water that steals the show. Rivers, lakes, creeks, are at the center of his travels and records.

Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents, vol 43, Chapter IV: Journey of the Fathers of our Society, and some Frenchmen, to the Country of the Upper Iroquois called Onnontoeronnons. 1653

Like Jacobs, the Jesuits were looking for souls, oh, and some gold too. I work at a Jesuit college. The Jesuits continue to celebrate their 17th century work among the Onondaga Nation of the Haudenosaunee. The Onondagas do not share that point of view. They see the Jesuits arrival more as a search for commodities and the first steps to eradication of the Onondaga people. So that is a different issue, but one that is always on my mind. I am not dealing with that question here, but I throw it out if anyone has ideas on how to approach it. Remember, I’m slow, but I get there.

Okay, so what about the mapping! The word clouds show us a different story from the one I am trying to uncover. I must say, mapping Jacobs’s narrative is where I had the most success (except for apparently drowning the city of Toronto in the middle of Lake Ontario).

The map above shows the locations of his travels and the animals he recorded seeing. This is particularly useful in tracking the timing and extent of impact of invasive species on native species in the Great Lakes, particularly the four above Niagara Falls. The Falls served as a barrier for invasive species, but the Erie Canal offered one entry point for invasive species above the falls, then the creation of the Welland Canal, which could take some ships up and around the falls offered another. Both were opened at the time Jacobs took this journey. At this point, native species of trout, whitefish, and sturgeon remain numerous.

After going through Flint’s narrative, I decided, at least for the moment, it was not worth mapping as his observations dealt mostly with increased manufacturing in cities through which he traveled. This could make a possibly interesting project, but it doesn’t fit the needs of this experiment. I slowly move on.

JR vol 43 Chapter IV

You cannot study Indigenous history in Iroquoia without dealing with the Jesuit Relations. There are problems, many problems. So a new problem exposed itself to me as I wanted to create maps. That problem is the use of place names. There was no standard spelling in the 17th century, plus, I am dealing with a translation, plus names have changed. Many times, there was no name used, you just had to figure it out “the river that feeds Gannentaa” is the Oswego River. Gannentaa is now called Onondaga Lake. That was the easy part. I believe these sources are going to be key in creating a larger environmental understanding of this region, but it is going to take time. Luckily, I’m used to going slow.

I can say the same thing for Bartram’s journal. He travels by land and water, and it can be quite difficult to figure out exactly where he is.

First, the modern city of Shamokin, PA is not where the original Indian village of Shamokin was located. The Shamokin to which Bartram refers, is actually Sunbury, PA. Mostly he is traveling up the east branch of the Susquehannah River, but where he is along the river is difficult to say. I thought I had him tracked, but then he was suddenly in Onondaga, and if he followed the path I thought, well, he would have had to fly to get to Onondaga so quickly. This will take some time and thought about how best to use such sources and the questions I want to ask of them. A slow process, but I will get there.

Mapping with kepler.gl

Learning about mapping data was a most enlightening experience, and one I was looking forward to the most. I do love a good map. I was therefore surprised by the fact that my initial conclusions, based solely on a point map were, well, wrong, as was soon revealed by other maps. The original point map showing the locations and basic data regarding the New Deal era slave narratives from Alabama led me to conclusions that the major metropolitan areas of Alabama (Montgomery, Birmingham, and Mobile) were where the most interviews took place.

This was true to an extent. However, when moving to maps that show concentrations of interviews in other manners (heat and cluster maps) Mobile still stands out as a key area of concentration, however, we also see other areas outside of Birmingham and especially Montgomery that show greater interview activity.

Kepler maps
Heat and cluster maps of WPA slave narrative interviews in Alabama

The original map above also provided information regarding the place of birth of the interviewees. Just a brief visual scan of this information led me to believe that most of the interviewees were born near where they were interviewed. However, an arc map that showed the place of birth v. the place of interview gave a different picture. There was much greater mobility of formerly enslaved people than first believed. Trying to read the information on the original map was difficult as the points overlapped. Furthermore, reading the information still wouldn’t give as clear of a story as the map does.

Map indicating place of birth of interviewees (as shown by the green end of the arc) v the location in which the interview took place (as shown by the orange end of the arc)

The Kepler mapping tool is helpful in making sense of spatial data in a “big data” collection such as the New Deal slave narratives. However, it is a learning curve. Understanding how to input parameters was relatively easy when given explicit instructions (thank you), but when I went back and tried to recreate the maps and create new ones, I was a bit confused. Like with so much it will take time. However, reading these various maps brought up questions that I would not have considered if I was just reading the text of the interviews, particularly about movements of people after emancipation.

Biggest lesson learned: never finish with first readings. Rearrange the material. Ask other questions, See how the results differ.